<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Reason To Keep a Project on Visual Studio 2003 &#8212; in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/12/21/a-reason-to-keep-a-project-on-visual-studio-2003-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/12/21/a-reason-to-keep-a-project-on-visual-studio-2003-in-2007/</link>
	<description>Musings on the craft and business of software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:45:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: infomaven</title>
		<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/12/21/a-reason-to-keep-a-project-on-visual-studio-2003-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-6291</link>
		<dc:creator>infomaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/12/21/a-reason-to-keep-a-project-on-visual-studio-2003-in-2007/#comment-6291</guid>
		<description>Sounds like something my boss would say. We have a lot of classic asp code and .NET 1.1 code to maintain and no immediate plans to upgrade to .NET 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like something my boss would say. We have a lot of classic asp code and .NET 1.1 code to maintain and no immediate plans to upgrade to .NET 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
