<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Be in Awe of &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/05/18/dont-be-in-awe-of-enterprise-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/05/18/dont-be-in-awe-of-enterprise-solutions/</link>
	<description>Musings on the craft and business of software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:21:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/05/18/dont-be-in-awe-of-enterprise-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 09:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/05/18/dont-be-in-awe-of-enterprise-solutions/#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more about P&amp;P.  We started using it for the logging aspect as a toe in the water exercise and gave up very quickly when we realised log4net was head and shoulders above in functionality and simplicity of use.  Have never gone back to P&amp;P, rather we look for other solutions which are usually free.  Unfortunately the &#039;everything you need&#039; approach is (IMHO) affecting C# 3.0 to its detriment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more about P&amp;P.  We started using it for the logging aspect as a toe in the water exercise and gave up very quickly when we realised log4net was head and shoulders above in functionality and simplicity of use.  Have never gone back to P&amp;P, rather we look for other solutions which are usually free.  Unfortunately the &#8216;everything you need&#8217; approach is (IMHO) affecting C# 3.0 to its detriment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
