<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby on Rails Hits a Wall; Twitter Stutters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/</link>
	<description>Musings on the craft and business of software development</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff McNeill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-06-04</title>
		<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff McNeill &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-06-04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>[...] Bob On Development Â» Ruby on Rails Hits a Wall; Twitter Stutters Apr 2007 (tags: rails) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bob On Development Â» Ruby on Rails Hits a Wall; Twitter Stutters Apr 2007 (tags: rails) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random8r</title>
		<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>random8r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Um actually you've always been able to sustain multiple connections simultaneously. This is part of Ruby. It just wasn't as "wonderfully easy" as the rest of Rails is, because it's rarely been a common problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um actually you&#8217;ve always been able to sustain multiple connections simultaneously. This is part of Ruby. It just wasn&#8217;t as &#8220;wonderfully easy&#8221; as the rest of Rails is, because it&#8217;s rarely been a common problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Seen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rails, Twitter and the 800lb Gorilla in the Room&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Seen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rails, Twitter and the 800lb Gorilla in the Room&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobondevelopment.com/2007/04/13/ruby-on-rails-hits-a-wall-twitter-stutters/#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>[...] of &#8220;no premature optimisation&#8221; to language and platform selection? If Twitter had chosen an &#8220;enterprise&#8221; class platform and tried to architect for 11k reqs/sec, chances are they would still be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of &#8220;no premature optimisation&#8221; to language and platform selection? If Twitter had chosen an &#8220;enterprise&#8221; class platform and tried to architect for 11k reqs/sec, chances are they would still be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
